Photography and Simulation

Normally, I try to transcend borders, but borders are sometimes necessary. The problem with borders is when one person or group of persons create it and everyone else follow it without reflection. The border I’m going to reflect on here is the one between a photo and a non-photo. At what processing stage will my [...]

Normally, I try to transcend borders, but borders are sometimes necessary. The problem with borders is when one person or group of persons create it and everyone else follow it without reflection. The border I’m going to reflect on here is the one between a photo and a non-photo. At what processing stage will my photo stop being a photo and become something else? I think it has to do with simulation.

A photo is a simulation of something. Let’s say I’m on a walk. My eyes is drawn to a beautiful tree. I’m starting to think about the tree as a photographic motif. I raise my camera, compose, measure the light, chose an aperture, shutter speed and ISO. When I’m home, I import it into Adobe Lightroom or another raw converter. Since I am shooting in raw format, the image isn’t really developed in the camera but in the raw converting software. Lightroom display my photo of the tree with default adjustments of exposure, white balance, contrast, saturation etc. I increase the the contrast and saturation with the curves tool and export it to Photoshop for some fine tuning. I’m starting to make some parts lighter, some darker. The motif is still in my mind and I’m trying to create a realistic or artistic simulation of it. Perhaps it has gone a few months. I really don’t remember the motif any more, but i estimate it from the photo, based on my knowledge of “reality”.

But at some stage the motif is blurred out. The image becomes something other than a simulation. It becomes something in itself. It becomes its own world with its own rules. Evaluating the image from the rules of the photography tradition infallible leads to one of two conclusions: it’s a badly (or too much) processed photo, or it’s not a photo at all. If I display it the image in a photography community, or in a photography exhibition, the image is going to be experienced with ‘photography eyes’, photography values. If I display it in an art exhibition, the evaluation criteria are different.

Perhaps “simulation” would work as a border concept for texts also, when thinking about realism and non realism in literature for example.

Tagged with:
 
Tagged with:
 
Tagged with:
 
Tagged with:
 

Daily Photo Design 0013

Location:
I was cooking spare ribs and grilled pumpkin, noticed the beauty of the shape and color in the pumpkin. Little time. Busy busy. Tripod, camera, flash, blue reflector screen (intuition…). Sigma 30/1,4 lens with full aperture to separate background and foreground from the main motive. Busy busy, my wife passes and put the small pumpkin [...]

Daily Photo Design 0013

Daily Photo Design 0013

Location:
I was cooking spare ribs and grilled pumpkin, noticed the beauty of the shape and color in the pumpkin. Little time. Busy busy. Tripod, camera, flash, blue reflector screen (intuition…). Sigma 30/1,4 lens with full aperture to separate background and foreground from the main motive. Busy busy, my wife passes and put the small pumpkin exactly where it is in the photo – Serendipity for sure. Busy busy. Compact Flash card into computer. Photo software. Darken the background – hide the dishwasher and sink. Leaving some details in the background, and most in the foreground to locate the photo. I didn’t want the pumpkins to hover in darkness.

I’m currently thinking (an soon writing) about location in photo/design/art, in relation to everything that happened since the birth of the Internet. With this location / description appended to the photo, no one can mistake it for being an unsuccessful professional studio photo. The location of this photo is elsewhere and the location is built into the photo itself. It’s all about being creative and having fun. Playing with technology, with reality. Share impressions. Learning.

By the way, the water drops are genuine – moisture from pumpkin flesh meeting air… The water drops are instances of serendipity. If this had been a professional studio photo, the photographer probably would have wiped the pumpkin clean and after that added water drops at exactly the right places.

By the way no 2, this is a banana pumkin from our garden. Some say its the tastiest kind of pumpkin, and I find it difficult to disagree. It was delicious!

Tagged with:
 

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

    © 2009 Peter Giger