Article & Reference Workflow: CiteULike, Zotero, Evernote

The reference workflow is different depending on situation, but this is my workflow for the web based article mentioned in the previous post.
This is no tutorial. This is a description of my workflow in a particular situation. Some prior knowledge might be necessary to understand, or some effort of gaining information about the applications and [...]

The reference workflow is different depending on situation, but this is my workflow for the web based article mentioned in the previous post.

This is no tutorial. This is a description of my workflow in a particular situation. Some prior knowledge might be necessary to understand, or some effort of gaining information about the applications and web services I mention.

The article has been published in the swedish journal/magazine Ord & Bild. It has been translated to English and is republished in Eurozine. I use this version because it is the most available. Sometimes I get the feeling that some researchers refer to obscure, unavailable versions of an article instead of a version available on the web. Probably because they think it looks more serious or academic that way. Stupid isn’t it. Always use the most available version, if you can choose.

citeulikeStep one: Getting the reference into CiteULike. CiteULike has a bookmarklet. I have to copy and paste the author, add the year and some small details. I also download the PDF version and upload it to CiteULike, to have my own copy to get back to. If there is no PDF to download, I create it from the web page and upload it. This is my backup-article. I also use CiteULike for social reasons, to find articles in the same way I use Flickr to view pictures or YouTube to watch videos.

zoteroStep two: Being on the Liedman post in CiteULike, I click on the icon at the right side in the URL filed to copy the reference into Zotero. In Zotero, I also choose Attachements / Add / Save a link to the current page. This works as a link to the place where the fulltext is located. Now, I can use the Zotero plugin in Open Office Writer to use the reference in an essay.

evernoteStep three: Well, you can stop here If you like, but recently I have added a step. I drag and drop the PDF in a notebook called “Articles” in Evernote. In this notebook I store all articles I use in my research. I also pickup the bibtex record from CiteULike and paste it above the PDF attachment. This is to always have a bibtex record together with the file in Evernote. To use attachments in Evernote, I think you might have to use the payed version – which is worth every penny… (update: some formats works with the free version, such as pdf & mp3, and of course the more ovious text, html, jpeg, gif, png, wav)

When I’m reading the article, or checking something out after I have read it, I double-click the aricle in Evernote. Adobe Acrobat opens and I can add comments and highlights. When I press sync in Evernote, the whole database is synched with the Evernote server and I can access all my articles from my account on the web. When I open Evernote one of my other computers, Evernote on this computer is synched with the Evernote server. The articles I just downloaded, read and commented on the previous computer also appears on this computer. The comments are visible on most PDF readers, I think, but if I am on my Mac or Windows I can use Adobe Acrobat to make comments. On a Linux machine I settle for reading.

Tagged with:
 

Lovely to read but a pain in the ass to refer to

Found this article on Eurozine by the Swedish intellectual historian Sven-Eric Liedman. I saved the pdf and read it on the Cybook. No problem reading even though I spent the whole day with a brightly shining computer screen. Didn’t felt a need to take notes, or highlight. But then I began to think about how [...]

Sven-Eric Liedman - The rebirth of religion and enchanting materialism

Found this article on Eurozine by the Swedish intellectual historian Sven-Eric Liedman. I saved the pdf and read it on the Cybook. No problem reading even though I spent the whole day with a brightly shining computer screen. Didn’t felt a need to take notes, or highlight. But then I began to think about how to refer to the article – if the need would arise. The librarian in me I guess… The problem: the article was published in Eurozine. This is what they are writing about themsleves:

Eurozine is a network of European cultural journals, linking up 70 partner journals and just as many associated magazines and institutions from nearly all European countries. Eurozine is also a netmagazine which publishes outstanding articles from its partner journals with additional translations into one of the major European languages.

So they are some kind of journalish magazine. But where are the numbers, the volume, the issues? If I would refer to this article, would the reference look like some anonymous website or blog without the standard serialized conventions? I don’t mind thinking about these tricky little things. It wont take long before the whole journal thinking vanish. This serializing was a sensible thing in the printing era, but now it just seems like something left over from an old and outdated process.

Liedman, Sven-Eric (2008), Eurozine, http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-04-01-liedman-en.html, read 2009-02-12

Or something similar. No problem at all. Love to get rid of all silly serialization in the academic world. Love to get everything immediate, transparent, connectable.

Tagged with:
 

Referring to some old "elephants"

Is it just me or is the Harvard/APA reference system comical when you have to create a reference to an old book “out of print” for hundred or thousand of years? Here is an example a an auto-generated reference created in the APA tradition:
Thinkers as Immanuel Kant has both mindsets and this duality is embedded [...]

Is it just me or is the Harvard/APA reference system comical when you have to create a reference to an old book “out of print” for hundred or thousand of years? Here is an example a an auto-generated reference created in the APA tradition:

Thinkers as Immanuel Kant has both mindsets and this duality is embedded in the title of his classic book Critique of Pure Reason (Kant & Meiklejohn, 2004).

And in the biliography / reference list:

Kant, I. & Meiklejohn, J. M. D. (2004). Critique of pure reason. Mineola, N.Y: Barnes & Noble.

I can’t stand this. It looks really stupid – if you know the original book was published in the end of the 18th century (1781). It’s quite easy to find a hack in this case. I can remove the reference entirely. It is not really needed here, but the problem remains the next time I reference something that actually is in the book and has to be referenced in a proper manner.

There are a lot of possible hacks and more proper solutions, but most of them doesn’t fit well with in a text based mostly on contemporarary references intertwined with a few references to these old “elephants”.

Tagged with:
 

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

    © 2009 Peter Giger